Hi Matthew,

joli.js is compatible with the jshint.com validation, but not with the JSLint one, which is slightly more strict. I am not sure if it is really useful to conform to JSLint, and the changes proposed by JSLint will help a lot, but go ahead if you feel so, and I'll merge your changes if they do not have any impact on the code's performance.

Thanks a lot,

Hey Xavier.
Ok, happy to go ahead and try. However, been chatting with Aroldan who created a full CRUD fork and think I will create a JSLint compatible version of that instead. Joli is great, but without the U in CRUD it's not ideal for me. Are you willing to incorporate Aroldan's changes?

Woops Xavier, just read your email and seen your last commit, and it seems you have included a solution where the U in CRUD is possible. I see you've also fixed a few of the issues with JSLint compatibility. I'll try out this version now, and if it works I'll fork and create a JSLint compatible version which you can incorporate if you wish. Thanks for the U update, greatly appreciated.

You're welcome :)

cheers,

Xavier

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:37 AM, mattheworiordan <
reply@reply.github.com>wrote:

Woops Xavier, just read your email and seen your last commit, and it seems
you have included a solution where the U in CRUD is possible. I see you've
also fixed a few of the issues with JSLint compatibility. I'll try out this
version now, and if it works I'll fork and create a JSLint compatible
version which you can incorporate if you wish. Thanks for the U update,
greatly appreciated.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#7 (comment)

Xavier Lacot
xavier@lacot.org
http://lacot.org/